Continental Time Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Continental Time Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co

70 A.D.2d 502, 415 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11853

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.2d 502 (Continental Time Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Continental Time Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co, 70 A.D.2d 502, 415 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 28, 1978, unanimously reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law, and defendant-appellant National Broadcasting Company’s (NBC) motion to dismiss the complaint granted without prejudice to application by plaintiff-respondent at Special Term for permission to replead (CPLR 3211, subd [e]) if so advised, with costs. The suit asserts that defendant-appellant breached a contract made with plaintiff. We find no actionable agreement whatever between the parties to this appeal. This is demonstrated in a brief recital of the suit’s background. In 1973 defendant Boys’ Clubs of America, a nonappellant, authorized NBC to create, develop and market products relating to the Boys’ Clubs, of the proceeds of which the clubs were to receive a percentage. In 1975, NBC delivered a copy of this contract to plaintiff, demonstrating its authority to act on behalf of the venture, and licensed, in writing, plaintiff to manufacture and market the described products, with resultant royalties to be paid. The latter writing was the sole agreement between the parties to this appeal, as is evidenced by a standard merger clause. Further, the contract was completely performed by grant of the license contained therein; this was its only function, there being no covenants for NBC to do anything else, and there being no recital whatever of any duty owed plaintiff by NBC. Special Term found a so-called tripartite agreement: "If the Boy’s Club franchise agreement with NBC mandated any obligation on NBC, then Continental may have had the right to rely on such obligation, and possibly did rely on such obligation.” We are adverted to nothing in either of NBC’s agreements with either defendant or defendant-appellant which provides a basis for this statement. It is possible—we do not here pass upon such a possibility—that plaintiff may have a cause based on factors not before us, and, if so advised, it may apply at Special Term to plead over accordingly. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 28, 1978, unanimously reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law, and defendant-appellant National Broadcasting Company’s (NBC) motion to dismiss the complaint granted without prejudice to application by plaintiff-respondent at Special Term for permission to replead (CPLR 3211, subd [e]) if so advised, with costs. The suit asserts that defendant-appellant breached a contract made with plaintiff. We find no actionable agreement whatever between the parties to this appeal. This is demonstrated in a brief recital of the suit’s background. In 1973 defendant Boys’ Clubs of America, a nonappellant, authorized NBC to create, develop and market products relating to the Boys’ Clubs, of the proceeds of which the clubs were to receive a percentage. In 1975, NBC delivered a copy of this contract to plaintiff, demonstrating its authority to act on behalf of the venture, and licensed, in writing, plaintiff to manufacture and market the described products, with resultant royalties to be paid. The latter writing was the sole agreement between the parties to this appeal, as is evidenced by a standard merger clause. Further, the contract was completely performed by grant of the license contained therein; this was its only function, there being no covenants for NBC to do anything else, and there being no recital whatever of any duty owed plaintiff by NBC. Special Term found a so-called tripartite agreement: "If the Boy’s Club franchise agreement with NBC mandated any obligation on NBC, then Continental may have had the right to rely on such obligation, and possibly did rely on such obligation.” We are adverted to nothing in either of NBC’s agreements with either defendant or defendant-appellant which provides a basis for this statement. It is possible—we do not here pass upon such a possibility—that plaintiff may have a cause based on factors not before us, and, if so advised, it may apply at Special Term to plead over accordingly. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 502, 415 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-time-corp-v-national-broadcasting-co-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack