Continental Steamship Co. v. Krysak
127 F.2d 292, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3855
Opinion
Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled cause, and the oral arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there was no reversible or prejudicial error in the court below wherein the questions were reserved for review, it is ordered that the decree below be and it is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Continental Steamship Co. v. Krysak, 127 F.2d 292, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3855 (6th Cir. 1942).
127 F.2d 292 (Continental Steamship Co. v. Krysak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.