Continental Southern Lines, Inc., Auto Transports, Inc. And Transport Insurance Company v. James H. Smith

Fifth Circuit

Continental Southern Lines, Inc., Auto Transports, Inc. And Transport Insurance Company v. James H. Smith

326 F.2d 757

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 1964

Docket20835_1

StatusPublished

This text of 326 F.2d 757 (Continental Southern Lines, Inc., Auto Transports, Inc. And Transport Insurance Company v. James H. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Continental Southern Lines, Inc., Auto Transports, Inc. And Transport Insurance Company v. James H. Smith, 326 F.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment was entered in the District Court on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff James H. Smith, and against the defendants Continental Southern Lines, Inc., Auto Transports, Inc. and its insurer, Transport Insurance Company in solido. The suit resulted from a collision between a bus on which Smith was a passenger and a truck owned and •operated by Auto Transports, Inc. The evidence adduced on the trial together with the appertaining Louisiana authorities make it plain that the judgment .should be, and it is Affirmed. Wise v. Prescott, 1963, 244 La. 157, 151 So.2d 356; and Landrum v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, La.App.1963, 149 So.2d 182.

The motion on behalf of Smith for •damages and costs under Rule 30 of this •court is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment was entered in the District Court on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff James H. Smith, and against the defendants Continental Southern Lines, Inc., Auto Transports, Inc. and its insurer, Transport Insurance Company in solido. The suit resulted from a collision between a bus on which Smith was a passenger and a truck owned and •operated by Auto Transports, Inc. The evidence adduced on the trial together with the appertaining Louisiana authorities make it plain that the judgment .should be, and it is Affirmed. Wise v. Prescott, 1963, 244 La. 157, 151 So.2d 356; and Landrum v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, La.App.1963, 149 So.2d 182.

The motion on behalf of Smith for •damages and costs under Rule 30 of this •court is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

326 F.2d 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-southern-lines-inc-auto-transports-inc-and-transport-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack