Continental Securities Co. v. . the Mich. Central Rd. Co.
111 N.E. 487, 217 N.Y. 617, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1369
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs to each party appearing and filing a separate brief, on the opinion in Venner v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (217 N. Y. 615), decided herewith.
Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Continental Securities Co. v. . the Mich. Central Rd. Co., 111 N.E. 487, 217 N.Y. 617, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1369 (N.Y. 1916).
111 N.E. 487 (Continental Securities Co. v. . the Mich. Central Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Venner v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
111 N.E. 487 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)