Continental Sales, Inc. v. River Marine Terminal, Inc.
This text of 579 So. 2d 164 (Continental Sales, Inc. v. River Marine Terminal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following hearing, it is ordered that the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
[165]*165See: Humphrys v. Jarrell, 104 So.2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958) and Jackson v. Stelco Employees Credit Union, Ltd., 178 So.2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). Levy and Goderich, JJ., concur. Ferguson, J. would grant the petition on the authority of Sparks v. Charles Wayne Group, 568 So.2d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), Ross v. Breder 528 So.2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) and Machado v. Foreign Trade, Inc., 537 So.2d 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 So. 2d 164, 1991 WL 88461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-sales-inc-v-river-marine-terminal-inc-fladistctapp-1991.