Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Tidewater Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

352 F.2d 524
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 1965
Docket22867-22869
StatusPublished

This text of 352 F.2d 524 (Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Tidewater Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Tidewater Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 352 F.2d 524 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

352 F.2d 524

CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.
TIDEWATER OIL COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.
The ATLANTIC REFINING COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.
CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

Nos. 22163, 22867-22869.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 5, 1965.

Lloyd F. Thanhouser, Tom Burton, Joseph C. Johnson, Houston, Tex., for Continental Oil Co.

Edmund D. Buckley, Los Angeles, Cal., Clyde E. Willbern, Houston, tex., for Tidewater Oil Co.

Bernard A. Foster, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Atlantic Ref. Co.

Gentry Lee, C.C. Cammack, Graydon D. Luthey, R. J. Leithead, Bartlesville, for Cities Service Oil Co.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., F.P.C., Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, F.P.C., Washington, D.C., Billy J. Williamson, Houston, Tex., James R. Lacey, Newark, N.J., for respondent.

Before WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

It is ordered that the joint motion of petitioners filed in the above numbered and entitled causes for an enlargement of the stay order heretofore granted by order filed January 27, 1965, in Cause No. 22163 only, so as to make that stay expressly effective as to each of the four petitioners named above be, and the same is hereby denied, it appearing that the stay orders previously entered by the other Courts of Appeals remain in full force and effect even though the cases have been transferred to this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 F.2d 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-oil-company-v-federal-power-commission-tidewater-oil-company-ca5-1965.