Continental Oil Co. v. United States

393 U.S. 79, 89 S. Ct. 233, 21 L. Ed. 2d 61, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3090, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,602

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Being convinced on the record before us that Maleo Refineries, Inc., was not a “failing company,” United States v. Third National Bank, 390 U. S. 171, 183 (1968); International Shoe Co. v. FTC, 280 U. S. 291 (1930), and that the record otherwise supports the decree, United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 U. S. 546 (1966), we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that this case involves issues of fact and law which should not be decided without plenary consideration, would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.