Continental Oil Co. v. United States

Supreme Court

Continental Oil Co. v. United States

393 U.S. 79, 89 S. Ct. 233, 21 L. Ed. 2d 61, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3090, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,602

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 21, 1968

Docket206

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 79 (Continental Oil Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Continental Oil Co. v. United States, 393 U.S. 79, 89 S. Ct. 233, 21 L. Ed. 2d 61, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3090, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,602 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Being convinced on the record before us that Maleo Refineries, Inc., was not a “failing company,” United States v. Third National Bank, 390 U. S. 171, 183 (1968); International Shoe Co. v. FTC, 280 U. S. 291 (1930), and that the record otherwise supports the decree, United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 U. S. 546 (1966), we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that this case involves issues of fact and law which should not be decided without plenary consideration, would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Being convinced on the record before us that Maleo Refineries, Inc., was not a “failing company,” United States v. Third National Bank, 390 U. S. 171, 183 (1968); International Shoe Co. v. FTC, 280 U. S. 291 (1930), and that the record otherwise supports the decree, United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 U. S. 546 (1966), we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that this case involves issues of fact and law which should not be decided without plenary consideration, would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 U.S. 79, 89 S. Ct. 233, 21 L. Ed. 2d 61, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3090, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-oil-co-v-united-states-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack