Home/Supreme Court/Continental Oil Co. v. United States

Continental Oil Co. v. United States

299 U.S. 510
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1936
DocketNo. 225
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 299 U.S. 510 (Continental Oil Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Oil Co. v. United States, 299 U.S. 510 (1936).

Opinion

The application for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims is dismissed upon the ground that it is premature, without prejudice to a renewal of the application after action by the Court of Claims on the [511]*511motion for amendment of the special findings. The motion to defer consideration of the application for certiorari is denied.

Mr. Arthur B. Hyman for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louis Gaudiosi, Charles Schwartz, and Randolph Phillips, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company Similarly Situated v. Richard K. Mellon, Robert T. McCracken C. Jared Ingersoll, Walter S. Franklin, James E. Gowen, Philip R. Clarke, James M. Symes, John A. Diemand, John B. Hollister, Lammot Dup. Copeland, Donald Danforth, R. George Rincliffe, William L. Day, Otto N. Frenzel, Fred Carpi, David C. Bevan, James P. Newell, Directors and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation, Incorporated Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Louis Gaudiosi, Charles Schwartz and Randolph Phillips, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company Similarly Situated v. Walter S. Franklin, Richard K. Mellon, Robert T. McCracken C. Jared Ingersoll, James E. Gowen, Philip R. Clarke, James M. Symes, John A. Diemand, John B. Hollister, Lammot Dup. Copeland, Donald Danforth, R. George Rincliffe, William L. Day, Otto N. Frenzel, Fred Carpi, David C. Bevan, James P. Newell, Directors: Bayard H. Roberts and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation Incorporated Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (Five Cases)
269 F.2d 873 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Gaudiosi v. Mellon
269 F.2d 873 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.
318 U.S. 203 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Philadelphia v. Union Traction Co.
304 U.S. 543 (Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 U.S. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-oil-co-v-united-states-scotus-1936.