Continental Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 313 U.S. 212 (Continental Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In its petition the Continental Oil Company challenged various provisions of an order of the Labor Board which the Circuit Court of Appeals had enforced, but we brought here only so much of the case as pertained to the reinstatement of two men, Jones and( Moore, 311 U. S. 637. Continental’s contention is that reinstatement was precluded because neither man remained an “employee” within § 2 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The decisive question, however, as we have ruled in the Phelps Dodge case, ante, p. 177, is whether, reinstatement will “effectuate the policies” of the Act. We therefore remand the case , for an exercise by the Board of its judgment on thát issue, in light of our opinion in the Phelps Dodge case. Remanded
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 U.S. 212, 61 S. Ct. 861, 85 L. Ed. 1292, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1199, 8 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-oil-co-v-national-labor-relations-board-scotus-1941.