Continental Motors, Inc. v. Danbury Aerospace, Inc., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision MacHined Airparts, Inc., Sterling MacHinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Continental Motors, Inc. v. Danbury Aerospace, Inc., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision MacHined Airparts, Inc., Sterling MacHinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc.

DecidedAugust 25, 2020

Docket04-19-00059-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Continental Motors, Inc. v. Danbury Aerospace, Inc., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision MacHined Airparts, Inc., Sterling MacHinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc. (Continental Motors, Inc. v. Danbury Aerospace, Inc., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision MacHined Airparts, Inc., Sterling MacHinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Continental Motors, Inc. v. Danbury Aerospace, Inc., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision MacHined Airparts, Inc., Sterling MacHinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2020

No. 04-19-00059-CV

CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Appellant v. DANBURY AEROSPACE, INC., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision Machined Airparts, Inc., Sterling Machinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc., Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CI18283 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On May 18, 2020, Appellees filed a motion to amend our judgment (1) to order Appellant to direct the escrow agent, Regions Bank, to release to Appellees the remaining amount in the Indemnity Escrow Fund for which the judgment was affirmed on appeal and (2) to render judgment against the surety, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, on Continental’s supersedeas bond. We GRANT Appellees’ motion to amend our judgment to render a judgment against the surety, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, on Appellant Continental Motors, Inc.’s supersedeas bond for the portion of the trial court’s judgment that was affirmed on appeal subject to the terms and conditions of the supersedeas bond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. We DENY Appellees’ motion in all other respects.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of August, 2020. FILE COPY

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2020

No. 04-19-00059-CV

CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Appellant v. DANBURY AEROSPACE, INC., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision Machined Airparts, Inc., Sterling Machinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc., Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CI18283 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On May 18, 2020, Appellees filed a motion to amend our judgment (1) to order Appellant to direct the escrow agent, Regions Bank, to release to Appellees the remaining amount in the Indemnity Escrow Fund for which the judgment was affirmed on appeal and (2) to render judgment against the surety, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, on Continental’s supersedeas bond. We GRANT Appellees’ motion to amend our judgment to render a judgment against the surety, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, on Appellant Continental Motors, Inc.’s supersedeas bond for the portion of the trial court’s judgment that was affirmed on appeal subject to the terms and conditions of the supersedeas bond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. We DENY Appellees’ motion in all other respects.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of August, 2020. FILE COPY

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Continental Motors, Inc. v. Danbury Aerospace, Inc., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision MacHined Airparts, Inc., Sterling MacHinery & Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-motors-inc-v-danbury-aerospace-inc-airmotive-engineering-texapp-2020.