Continental Merchandise Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 486, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1047
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Continental Merchandise Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 434
United States Customs Court·Decided September 16, 1954·No. V. D. 9; Entry No. 63932·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in Continental Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 434, Abstract 57941. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were $11.98 per unit plus packing for the binoculars, and $1.30 per unit plus pacldng for the leather cases.

[487]*487I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental Merchandise Co. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 486, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1047 (cusc 1954).

33 Cust. Ct. 486 (Continental Merchandise Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental Merchandise Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 434 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)