Continental Leather Co. v. Liverpool
This text of 228 A.D. 707 (Continental Leather Co. v. Liverpool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to resettle the ease on appeal by including the demand and the bill of particulars granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the bill of particulars is an amplification of plaintiff’s complaint and, therefore, a part of that pleading which is always before the court, and need not be offered in evidence. (Roscoe Lumber Co. v. Standard Silica Co., 62 App. Div. 421.) Without its presence in the record on appeal, the reference thereto on the defendant appellant’s motion to dismiss would be unintelligible. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-leather-co-v-liverpool-nyappdiv-1930.