Continental Leather Co. v. Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co.

230 A.D. 785

This text of 230 A.D. 785 (Continental Leather Co. v. Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Leather Co. v. Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co., 230 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment and order modifying judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff sought to recover upon the theory of an express contract evidenced by a bill of lading, of which no proof was given. The court was not warranted in directing a verdict upon plaintiff’s testimony as to the cause of the damage and the damage. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-leather-co-v-liverpool-brazil-river-plate-steam-navigation-nyappdiv-1930.