Continental Insurance v. Northberry Concrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Continental Insurance v. Northberry Concrete Corp.

156 A.D.2d 419, 548 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15671

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 A.D.2d 419 (Continental Insurance v. Northberry Concrete Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Continental Insurance v. Northberry Concrete Corp., 156 A.D.2d 419, 548 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Hopkins, J.H.O.), dated May 3, 1988, which denied its motion to vacate a prior order of preclusion, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 9, 1988, which denied its motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, e.g., Dennis v Stout, 24 AD2d 461). Moreover, no direct appeal lies from an order of a Judicial Hearing Officer appointed to supervise disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3104 (see, CPLR 3104 [d]; see also, Crow-Crimmins-Wolf & Munier v County of Westchester, 110 AD2d 871). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Hopkins, J.H.O.), dated May 3, 1988, which denied its motion to vacate a prior order of preclusion, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 9, 1988, which denied its motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, e.g., Dennis v Stout, 24 AD2d 461). Moreover, no direct appeal lies from an order of a Judicial Hearing Officer appointed to supervise disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3104 (see, CPLR 3104 [d]; see also, Crow-Crimmins-Wolf & Munier v County of Westchester, 110 AD2d 871). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.2d 419, 548 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-insurance-v-northberry-concrete-corp-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack