Continental Insurance v. Canni
This text of 192 A.D.2d 651 (Continental Insurance v. Canni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, George R. Canni appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 15, 1991, which granted the application.
[652]*652Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant failed to obtain the insurer’s consent prior to settling his claim against, and releasing from all liability, the motorist who allegedly caused his injuries, in contravention of the policy provisions governing underinsured motorist claims. Accordingly, the court properly granted the insurer’s application for a permanent stay of arbitration of the insurer’s denial of underinsured motorist benefits (see, Weinberg v Transamerica Ins. Co., 62 NY2d 379; Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Scirica, 170 AD2d 448; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Donath, 164 AD2d 889; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Parker, 160 AD2d 882; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Taglianetti, 122 AD2d 40). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A.D.2d 651, 596 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-insurance-v-canni-nyappdiv-1993.