Continental Insurance Co. v. De Quesada

518 So. 2d 931, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2904, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11591
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1987·No. Nos. 87-1463, 87-1868·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Final Declaratory Judgment based on a finding that the “Florida Amendment” to the insurance policy provided by Continental Insurance Company is valid and that Continental did not consent to arbitration. §§ 627.419(1), 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1985). See Lee v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 469 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA) (since the insurance policy in question is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect as written), review denied, 480 So.2d 1295 (Fla.1985); Eugene W. Kelsey & Son, Inc. v. Architectural Openings, Inc., 484 So.2d 610 (Fla. 5th DCA) (in order for a dispute to be arbitrable, a written contract must show the parties’ intent to submit to arbitration), review denied, 492 So.2d 1330 (Fla.1986).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental Insurance Co. v. De Quesada, 518 So. 2d 931, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2904, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

518 So. 2d 931 (Continental Insurance Co. v. De Quesada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eugene W. Kelsey v. ARCHIT. OPENINGS
484 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Lee v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
469 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)