Continental Ins. Co. v. Belflower

355 So. 2d 840, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15424
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 22, 1978
DocketNo. GG-443
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 355 So. 2d 840 (Continental Ins. Co. v. Belflower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Ins. Co. v. Belflower, 355 So. 2d 840, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15424 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinions

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

Volusia County and its insurer appeal from a money judgment entered on a jury verdict that appellee Belflower was damaged to the extent of $50,000 when he was injured as his car struck a concrete slab off the surface of a narrow dirt road near Edgewater. The judgment was for $10,000, reflecting the jury’s finding that Belflower’s negligence was 80 percent responsible for the accident and the County’s negligence was 20 percent responsible.

The evidence was insufficient to submit to the jury the issue of the County’s asserted negligence in failing to clear obstacles from the grassy area adjoining the road and in failing to post signs warning of such obstacles. There is no evidence of formal dedication of the road. Belflower’s case rests entirely on Section 95.361, Florida Statutes (1975), which presumes dedication from county maintenance and repair “continuously and uninterruptedly for four years.” There was evidence that a county commissioner caused the road to be cut many years ago and that twice since then other commissioners caused shell to be placed on portions of the road for the convenience of hunters. But there was an entire absence of evidence that even these desultory activities occurred within a four year period, or that the county performed any inspection or repair “continuously and uninterruptedly for four years” on what otherwise must be regarded as a private road. The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for entry of judgment for appellants.

REVERSED.

ERVIN, J., concurs. BOOTH, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pasco v. City of Oldsmar
953 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Hodges v. City of Winter Park
433 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1981

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 So. 2d 840, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-ins-co-v-belflower-fladistctapp-1978.