Continental Gin Co. v. Connell

124 So. 916, 220 Ala. 697
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 24, 1929
Docket6 Div. 392.
StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 916 (Continental Gin Co. v. Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Gin Co. v. Connell, 124 So. 916, 220 Ala. 697 (Ala. 1929).

Opinion

Petition for certiorari to Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John Denson, Judge.

SAYRE, J.

The facts shown by the trial judge’s finding in this cause are more favorable to the workman’s right to compensation than were the facts shown in Dean v. Stock-ham Pipe & Fittings Co., ante, p. 25, 123 So. 225, which, otherwise, it closely resembles. On the authority of that case, the judgment here in question is affirmed.

Writ denied; judgment affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dean v. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co.
123 So. 225 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 916, 220 Ala. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-gin-co-v-connell-ala-1929.