Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.
This text of 252 A.2d 417 (Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONTINENTAL FINANCE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMBRIDGE LEE METAL CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. William S. Katchen argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Ravin & Ravin, attorneys; Mr. David N. Ravin, of counsel).
Mr. Don Allen Resnikoff, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for respondent United States of America (Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., United States Attorney, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Hand's opinion for the Law Division, as reported in 100 N.J. Super. 327 (1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.2d 417, 105 N.J. Super. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-fin-inc-v-cambridge-lee-metal-co-njsuperctappdiv-1969.