Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.

252 A.2d 417, 105 N.J. Super. 406
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMay 8, 1969
StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.2d 417 (Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co., 252 A.2d 417, 105 N.J. Super. 406 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

105 N.J. Super. 406 (1969)
252 A.2d 417

CONTINENTAL FINANCE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMBRIDGE LEE METAL CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 28, 1969.
Decided May 8, 1969.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. William S. Katchen argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Ravin & Ravin, attorneys; Mr. David N. Ravin, of counsel).

Mr. Don Allen Resnikoff, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for respondent United States of America (Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., United States Attorney, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Hand's opinion for the Law Division, as reported in 100 N.J. Super. 327 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Fin., Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal
241 A.2d 853 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Continental Finance, Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.
252 A.2d 417 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.2d 417, 105 N.J. Super. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-fin-inc-v-cambridge-lee-metal-co-njsuperctappdiv-1969.