Continental Const. Co. v. City of Altoona
This text of 92 F. 822 (Continental Const. Co. v. City of Altoona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action in the circuit court for the Western district of Pennsylvania to recover for the breach of a contract alleged to have been made by the defendant in error. The court helow entered a judgment of compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to strike off, and thereupon this writ of error was sued out. We are all o-f opinion that the action of the court [824]*824below was right. The contract alleged never bad any legal existence, and this is so clearly demonstrated by the opinion of the learned judge that further discussion of the subject would be superfluous. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F. 822, 35 C.C.A. 27, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-const-co-v-city-of-altoona-ca3-1899.