Continental Const. Co. v. City of Altoona

92 F. 822, 35 C.C.A. 27, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 1899
DocketNo. 47
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 F. 822 (Continental Const. Co. v. City of Altoona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Const. Co. v. City of Altoona, 92 F. 822, 35 C.C.A. 27, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194 (3d Cir. 1899).

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action in the circuit court for the Western district of Pennsylvania to recover for the breach of a contract alleged to have been made by the defendant in error. The court helow entered a judgment of compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to strike off, and thereupon this writ of error was sued out. We are all o-f opinion that the action of the court [824]*824below was right. The contract alleged never bad any legal existence, and this is so clearly demonstrated by the opinion of the learned judge that further discussion of the subject would be superfluous. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gamewell Co. v. City of Honolulu
33 Haw. 817 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1936)
Ohio County v. Baird
181 F. 49 (Sixth Circuit, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F. 822, 35 C.C.A. 27, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-const-co-v-city-of-altoona-ca3-1899.