Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Werner

215 P. 458, 36 Idaho 601, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 34
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 215 P. 458 (Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Werner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Werner, 215 P. 458, 36 Idaho 601, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 34 (Idaho 1923).

Opinions

BUDGE, C. J.

This action was brought by Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank against Wilhelmina Werner, her husband, and Gooding county, Idaho, to foreclose a lien upon certain real property for the unpaid principal, interest and assessments due for water right. Default was entered against Wilhelmina Werner and no service was made upon her husband. Respondent, Gooding county, answered, claiming its lien for taxes on said premises to be prior to the' lien of appellant. The cause was tried to the court upon a stipulation of facts and judgment was entered in favor of appellant and against respondent, Wilhelmina Werner, ordering foreclosure and sale of the premises. The court adjudged and decreed the lien of respondent, Gooding county, to be a prior lien to [602]*602that of appellant. Judgment was entered and filed on June 20, 1921. Notice of appeal from the judgment was not filed until September 20, 1921, more than 90 days after the entry of the judgment and after the statutory time for filing the same had expired.

(April 23, 1923.)

C. S., sec. 7152, provides as follows:

“An appeal may be taken to the supreme court from a district court:
“1. From a final judgment in an action .... within 90 days after the entry of such judgment .... ”

In the ease of Goade v. Gossett, 35 Ida. 84, 204 Pac. 670, it is held: “Appeal from judgment taken after expiration of statutory time will be dismissed.”

See, also, to the same effect: Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor M. Co., 30 Ida. 719, 167 Pac. 1163; Mills v. Board of County Commrs., 35 Ida. 47, 204 Pac. 876; Chapman v. Boehm, 27 Ida. 150, 147 Pac. 289; Moe v. Harger, 10 Ida. 194, 77 Pac. 645.

In the case last cited it is said: “This is a jurisdictional question and the court has no power to extend the time or cure the defect. On this question there is a unanimity of opinion among the courts.”

For the reason that this court is without jurisdiction this appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Costs are awarded to respondent, Gooding county.

McCarthy and Dunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Bechtel Corporation
261 P.2d 818 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1953)
Connell v. Connell
261 P.2d 810 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1953)
First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.
1941 OK 87 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.
96 P.2d 232 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)
Idaho Farms Co. v. North Side Canal Co.
24 F. Supp. 189 (D. Idaho, 1938)
Warren v. Blackman
250 N.W. 681 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1933)
Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.
12 P.2d 263 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)
Robinson v. Hanson
282 P. 782 (Utah Supreme Court, 1929)
Bosworth v. Anderson
280 P. 227 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1929)
Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. Minidoka County
272 P. 498 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1928)
Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Co. v. Brown
274 U.S. 630 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Black
247 P. 486 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)
Dragon v. Trimburger
243 P. 824 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1926)
Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Cassia County
5 F.2d 955 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
Brown v. Portneuf-Marsh Valley Irr. Co.
299 F. 338 (D. Idaho, 1924)
Wallace v. McKenna
217 P. 982 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)
Kimzey v. Highland Livestock & Land Co.
214 P. 750 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 P. 458, 36 Idaho 601, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-commercial-trust-savings-bank-v-werner-idaho-1923.