Continental Casualty Co. v. Sudderth

1935 OK 106, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 480, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 728
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 5, 1935
Docket25536
StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK 106 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Sudderth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Casualty Co. v. Sudderth, 1935 OK 106, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 480, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 728 (Okla. 1935).

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

This is an original action to review the award of the State Industrial Commission. The claimant received his injury at the same time and in the same manner as the claimant, Jack Goodnature, received his injuries as outlined in cause No. 25535, entitled Continental Casualty Company v. Jack Goodnature et al., opinion in which was promulgated on the 5th day of February, 1935 (170 Okla. 477, 41 P. (2d) 77).

The facts in this case are identical with the facts in that case, and the rules of law therein announced are applicable here. The award of the Industrial Commission is, therefore, affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J:, and RILEY, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Casualty Co. v. Goodnature
1935 OK 102 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1935 OK 106, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 480, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-casualty-co-v-sudderth-okla-1935.