Continental Casualty Co. v. Staffing Concepts, Inc.

Seventh Circuit

Continental Casualty Co. v. Staffing Concepts, Inc.

261 F. App'x 890

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 11, 2008

DocketNo. 07-2475

StatusPublished

This text of 261 F. App'x 890 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Staffing Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Continental Casualty Co. v. Staffing Concepts, Inc., 261 F. App'x 890 (7th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The appeal is DISMISSED for want of appellate jurisdiction. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A) & (B); Middleby Carp. v. Hussmann Corp., 962 F.2d 614, 616 (7th Cir.1992) (barring appeal when an order denying a petition is “a delay incident to an orderly process”); IDS Life Ins. Co. v. SunAmerica, Inc., 103 F.3d 524, 526-27 (7th Cir.1996) (extending Middleby to denials of an order to arbitrate under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A)). An opinion will follow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The appeal is DISMISSED for want of appellate jurisdiction. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A) & (B); Middleby Carp. v. Hussmann Corp., 962 F.2d 614, 616 (7th Cir.1992) (barring appeal when an order denying a petition is “a delay incident to an orderly process”); IDS Life Ins. Co. v. SunAmerica, Inc., 103 F.3d 524, 526-27 (7th Cir.1996) (extending Middleby to denials of an order to arbitrate under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A)). An opinion will follow.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 F. App'x 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-casualty-co-v-staffing-concepts-inc-ca7-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack