Continental Casualty Co. v. Scharff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Continental Casualty Co. v. Scharff

1935 OK 104, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 480, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 730

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 5, 1935·No. 25449·Published

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

This is an original action to review the award of the State Industrial Commission. The claimant received his injury at the same time and in the same manner as the claimant, Jack Goodnature, received his injuries as outlined in cause No. 25535, entitled Continental Casualty Company v. Jack Goodnature et al., opinion in which was promulgated on the 5th day of February, 1936 (170 Okla. 477, 41 P. (2d) 77).

The facts in this case are identical with the facts in that case, and the rules of law therein announced are applicable here. The award of the Industrial Commission is, therefore, affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHELPS, J.

This is an original action to review the award of the State Industrial Commission. The claimant received his injury at the same time and in the same manner as the claimant, Jack Goodnature, received his injuries as outlined in cause No. 25535, entitled Continental Casualty Company v. Jack Goodnature et al., opinion in which was promulgated on the 5th day of February, 1936 (170 Okla. 477, 41 P. (2d) 77).

The facts in this case are identical with the facts in that case, and the rules of law therein announced are applicable here. The award of the Industrial Commission is, therefore, affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Continental Casualty Co. v. Scharff, 1935 OK 104, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 480, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 730 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

1935 OK 104 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Scharff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related