Continental Casualty Co. v. Pittman

89 S.E. 716, 145 Ga. 641, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 430
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

Mrs. Caroline Pittman, the mother of Herbert Pittman, recovered on the trial of a suit upon a policy of accident insurance issued by the Continental Casualty Company. One clause of the policy provides for payments of indemnities set forth, for bodily injuries caused through external, violent, and purely accidental means; and another clause reads as follows: “If sunstroke, freezing, or hydrophobia, due in either case to external, violent, and accidental means, shall result, independently of all other causes, in the death of the insured within ninety days from date of exposure or infection, the company will pay said principal sum.” The plaintiff was the beneficiary in the policy. The insured suffered a sunstroke on July 19, 1913, and died on that date. He was a railroad fireman, and occupied a position on the sunny side of the cab of an engine on a train running from Macon to Atlanta, Georgia. The weather was very hot, and the insured was exposed to the sun and to the heat of the engine. Coming from Macon to Atlanta, he was almost continuously firing; he became overheated, was taken with a high fever, and suffered a sunstroke which had been produced by the extremely high heat to which he had been subjected in the performance of his duties.

The .verdict in favor of the plaintiff • was unauthorized, and should have been set aside. The death of the insured was from sunstroke, which overcame the decedent while he was performing his ordinary duties in the ordinary way upon a hot summer day; and there is nothing in the evidence to show that the sunstroke was due to “external, violent, and accidental means,” within the meaning of those terms as employed in the policy sued upon. Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co. (Texas Civ. App.), 145 S. W. 636, and eases there cited.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental Casualty Co. v. Pittman, 89 S.E. 716, 145 Ga. 641, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 430 (Ga. 1916).

89 S.E. 716 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. Upshaw
195 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Continental Assurance Co. v. Rothell
176 S.E.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Davison v. National Life & Accident Insurance
126 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Johnson v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.
90 S.E.2d 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Lloyd
10 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
18 S.E.2d 803 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1942)
Cramer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
13 A.2d 651 (Atlantic County Circuit Court, N.J., 1940)
Adkins v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
179 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Bukaty
92 F.2d 1 (Tenth Circuit, 1937)
Bukata v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
67 P.2d 607 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)
Goethe v. New York Life Insurance
190 S.E. 451 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1937)
American National Insurance v. Chappelear
181 S.E. 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Griswold v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
180 A. 649 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1935)
Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Green.
1935 OK 695 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Continental Casualty Co. v. Rucker
179 S.E. 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
291 U.S. 491 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Ridgeley Protective Assn. v. Smith
182 N.E. 345 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)
Nickman v. New York Life Ins. Co.
39 F.2d 763 (Sixth Circuit, 1930)
Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.
200 P. 1017 (Utah Supreme Court, 1921)
Johnson v. Ætna Life Insurance
101 S.E. 134 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)