Continental Casualty Co. v. Lanzisero
181 A. 170, 119 N.J. Eq. 166, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 610
Opinion
The decree appealed from 'will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Continental Casualty Co. v. Lanzisero, 181 A. 170, 119 N.J. Eq. 166, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 610 (N.J. 1935).
181 A. 170 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Lanzisero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Affiliated FM Ins. v. Kushner Companies
627 A.2d 710 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Wall
222 A.2d 282 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
MERCHANTS IND., ETC. v. Victory Iron Works, Inc.
192 A.2d 592 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Calhoun
112 So. 2d 366 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1959)
Buzzone v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.
125 A.2d 551 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
New Zealand Insurance Company v. Holloway
123 F. Supp. 642 (W.D. Louisiana, 1954)
Tri-State Ins. Co. v. Ford
120 F. Supp. 118 (D. New Mexico, 1954)
Farm Bureau Automobile Ins. Co. v. Georgiana
82 A.2d 217 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.
64 A.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1948)
Matlock ex rel. Matlock v. Hollis
109 P.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1941)