Continental Casualty Co. v. Kessinger

1935 OK 103, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 479, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 727
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 5, 1935·No. 25534·Published

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

This is an original action to review the award of the State Industrial Commission. The claimant received his injury at the same time and in the same manner as the claimant, Jack Goodnature, received his injuries as outlined in cause No. 25535, entitled Continental Casualty Company v. Jack Goodnature et al., opinion in which was promulgated on the 5th day of February, 1935 (170 Okla. 477, 41 P. (2d) 77).

The facts are identical in this case with the facts in that case, and the rules of law therein announced are applicable here. The *480 award of the Industrial Commission is, therefore, affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental Casualty Co. v. Kessinger, 1935 OK 103, 41 P.2d 81, 170 Okla. 479, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 727 (Okla. 1935).

1935 OK 103 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Kessinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental Casualty Co. v. Goodnature
1935 OK 102 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)