Continental Casualty Co. v. Curran
This text of 612 F. App'x 687 (Continental Casualty Co. v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
John F. Curran, III 'seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying a motion for continuance. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order that Curran seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Stevenson v. City of Seat Pleasant, 743 F.3d 411, 415-16 (4th Cir.2014). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny the parties’ pending motions as moot. We dispense with' oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F. App'x 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-casualty-co-v-curran-ca4-2015.