Continental Cas. Co. v. Rizzio Truck Co.
This text of 217 Cal. App. 2d 771 (Continental Cas. Co. v. Rizzio Truck Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
RIZZIO TRUCK COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.
Weingand, Tipton, Kendig & Stockwell and Eugene L. Stockwell, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Hecker, Dunford & Kenealy and Mark R. McKee for Defendant and Respondent.
FILES, J.
Plaintiff's notice of appeal states that plaintiff appeals "from the judgment of the above captioned court sustaining defendants' demurrer to plaintiff's complaint on the 7th day of December, 1961."
The record on appeal contains a minute order dated December 7, 1961, whereby the demurrer of one defendant was sustained with leave to amend within 10 days. There is no judgment. [1] The order sustaining the demurrer is not appealable, and this court has no choice but to dismiss the appeal. (Curnutt v. Holk, 203 Cal.App.2d 6 [21 Cal.Rptr. 224].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Shinn, P. J., and Ford, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 Cal. App. 2d 771, 32 Cal. Rptr. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-cas-co-v-rizzio-truck-co-calctapp-1963.