Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Poll

76 F.3d 385, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40918, 1995 WL 755627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Poll. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 F.3d 1044
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 19, 1995·No. 94-56210·Unpublished

Opinion

76 F.3d 385

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION, INC. Plaintiff-Appellee/Counter-Defendant,
v.
Alvin I. POLL, individually and d/b/a/ Cabletronics, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants/Counter-Claimants.

No. 94-56210.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1995.

Before: SCHROEDER and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,* District Judge.

ORDER

This appeal is dismissed as moot. Upon filing of a notice of appeal from the judgment for a permanent injunction, the permanent injunction appeal will be calendared before this panel. The appellant may also move to expedite that appeal.

*

Honorable James M. Burns, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Poll, 76 F.3d 385, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40918, 1995 WL 755627 (9th Cir. 1995).

76 F.3d 385 (Continental Cablevision, Inc. v. Poll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.