Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Baker

61 So. 575, 132 La. 544, 1913 La. LEXIS 1907
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 17, 1913
DocketNo. 19,438
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 So. 575 (Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Baker, 61 So. 575, 132 La. 544, 1913 La. LEXIS 1907 (La. 1913).

Opinions

LAND, J.

This suit is against the maker and indorsers of a promissory note, and the latter have appealed from a judgment in solido against all the defendants. The indorsers pleaded their discharge for want of due presentment and notice, as required by law. The note corresponds in terms and stipulations with the note sued on in the case of Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. J. M. Dresser (No. 19,329) 61 South. 561, 1 of the docket of this court, this day decided in favor of the plaintiff. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment must be affirmed. The exception of want of capacity in [546]*546the plaintiff 'bank to sue and stand in judgment is without merit, and was properly overruled.

Judgment, affirmed.

MONROE, J. I concur in the decree. PRO YO STY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Achee v. Williams
6 La. App. 316 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Foster
249 S.W. 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 So. 575, 132 La. 544, 1913 La. LEXIS 1907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-bank-trust-co-v-baker-la-1913.