Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone
Opinion
A careful perusal of the present record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The court’s charge on the burden of proof is supported by the case of Tobacco Growers Assn. v. Moss, 187 N. C., 421.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
124 S.E. 923 (Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.