Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone
This text of 124 S.E. 923 (Continental Aluminum Co. v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful perusal of the present record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The court’s charge on the burden of proof is supported by the case of Tobacco Growers Assn. v. Moss, 187 N. C., 421.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.E. 923, 188 N.C. 827, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continental-aluminum-co-v-stone-nc-1924.