ContiMortgage Corp. v. DeJesus

23 A.D.3d 603, 805 N.Y.S.2d 400

This text of 23 A.D.3d 603 (ContiMortgage Corp. v. DeJesus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ContiMortgage Corp. v. DeJesus, 23 A.D.3d 603, 805 N.Y.S.2d 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

[604]*604In an action to foreclose a mortgage, Sprint Equities (NY), Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Archer, J.H.O.), dated January 3, 2005, which, after a hearing, in effect, denied its motion to stay the transfer of a referee’s deed to the purchaser of the subject property at a foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that no contract existed between the plaintiff and the nonparty appellant. The offer of a pay-off agreement by the plaintiff to the nonparty appellant, which was referred to as an “addendum” stated that “this addendum must be signed and returned ... by 10/8/1999 or this agreement is void” (emphasis in original). The nonparty appellant neither obtained the necessary signatures nor returned the “addendum” to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied the motion of the nonparty appellant to stay the transfer of the referee’s deed to the purchaser of the subject property at the foreclosure sale. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.3d 603, 805 N.Y.S.2d 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contimortgage-corp-v-dejesus-nyappdiv-2005.