Conticommodity Services, Inc. v. Transamerica Leasing, Inc.

473 So. 2d 1053, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 3977
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 28, 1985
Docket84-154
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 473 So. 2d 1053 (Conticommodity Services, Inc. v. Transamerica Leasing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conticommodity Services, Inc. v. Transamerica Leasing, Inc., 473 So. 2d 1053, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 3977 (Ala. 1985).

Opinion

ALMON, Justice.

Appellant makes forceful, but ultimately unpersuasive, arguments for enforcement of its contractual forum-selection clause. It seeks to have us distinguish or overrule Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Foster, 382 So.2d 554 (Ala.1980). Upon consideration of the record, the arguments, the holding in Redwing, and other authorities on the subject, we find that the instant case is indistinguishable from Redwing and that the holding therein is due to be reaffirmed. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of Redwing.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, EM-BRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Professional Ins. Corp. v. Sutherland
700 So. 2d 347 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997)
Keelean v. Central Bank of the South
544 So. 2d 153 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 So. 2d 1053, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 3977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conticommodity-services-inc-v-transamerica-leasing-inc-ala-1985.