Conti v. Volper

229 F.2d 317
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 11, 1956·No. No. 165, Docket 23795·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Constance v. Harvey, 2 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 571, reluctantly followed by Judge Byers, may seem to reach an inequitable-result, but Section 70, sub. c, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 110, sub. c, provides: “The trustee, as to all property, whether or not coming into posses[318] sion or control of the court, upon which a creditor of the bankrupt could have obtained a lien by legal or equitable proceedings at the date of bankruptcy, shall be deemed vested as of such date with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a creditor then holding a lien thereon by such proceedings, whether or not such a creditor actually exists”; and it is difficult to see how such plain language could be disregarded.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conti v. Volper, 229 F.2d 317 (2d Cir. 1956).

229 F.2d 317 (Conti v. Volper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit
364 U.S. 603 (Supreme Court, 1961)
In re P.T.G. Grain Service
185 F. Supp. 332 (D. Minnesota, 1960)
In re Scott-Frederick Motor Co.
177 F. Supp. 758 (E.D. Kentucky, 1959)
Brookhaven Bank & Trust Company v. D. E. Gwin
253 F.2d 17 (Fifth Circuit, 1958)
In re Plymouth Glass Co.
171 F. Supp. 650 (E.D. Michigan, 1957)