Conti v. Valinoti

206 A.D.2d 345, 614 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7123
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.) dated January 4, 1993, which denied their motion for leave to enter a default judgment and granted the defendant’s cross motion to the extent of directing them to accept the defendant’s answer and discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion and granting the defendant’s cross motion. The defendant set forth a meritorious defense; his delay in serving his answer did not result in prejudice to the plaintiffs, and there was no showing that the delay was in any way deliberate (see, Henderson Murphy v D. V. Waste Control Corp., 124 AD2d 573). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conti v. Valinoti, 206 A.D.2d 345, 614 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

206 A.D.2d 345 (Conti v. Valinoti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaylord v. Serafino
274 A.D.2d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)