Conti v. CARCIC
5 A.3d 819, 607 Pa. 711
This text of 5 A.3d 819 (Conti v. CARCIC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conti v. CARCIC, 5 A.3d 819, 607 Pa. 711 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ROBERT CONTI AND DEBRA CONTI, HIS WIFE
v.
JEFFREY D. CARCIC, MARK S. FERRARE AND THE CITY OF ERIE
THOMAS MAY
v.
JEFFREY D. CARCIC, MARK S. FERRARE AND THE CITY OF ERIE
GARY MCQUEENEY AND DENISE MCQUEENEY, HIS WIFE
v.
JEFFREY D. CARCIC, MARK S. FERRARE AND THE CITY OF ERIE
MARK FERRARE AND CHUCK RUFINI
v.
JEFFREY D. CARCIC
PETITION OF: GARY McQUEENEY AND DENISE MCQUEENEY, HIS WIFE
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 A.3d 819, 607 Pa. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conti-v-carcic-pa-2010.