Contessa Food Products, Inc. v. Conagra, Inc.

117 F. App'x 731
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Contessa Food Products, Inc. v. Conagra, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 F.3d 1370
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 29, 2004·No. No. 04-1607·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The parties move jointly to stay briefing for 76 days, until February 7, 2005. We consider whether ConAgra, Inc. et al.’s (Conagra) appeal should be dismissed as premature.

ConAgra appealed from the August 6, 2004 decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Contesssa Food Prods., Inc. v. ConAgra, Inc., No. CV 99-04145 (C.D. Cal.) granting Contessa Food Products, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of infringement and denying ConAgra’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement.

The parties state that they are in the midst of mediation concerning the entry of final judgment. A review of the district court docket sheet reflects that the district court has not yet entered final judgment. Therefore, we conclude that the appeal is premature and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(a)(1) (every judgment must be set forth on a separate document).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The parties’ joint motion to stay is denied.

(2) The appeal is dismissed.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contessa Food Products, Inc. v. Conagra, Inc., 117 F. App'x 731 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

117 F. App'x 731 (Contessa Food Products, Inc. v. Conagra, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.