Contee v. Findley

1 H. & J. 331
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 15, 1802·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rumsey, Ch. J.

Said it was a mistaken idea that interest was always given by this coprt as a matter of course. It is in their discretion, and they will allow; ipferest, in the natura of damages, in such cases as? they thiqk it should be allowed.

In this case the court direct the interest to be calculated on the whole sum recovered in the court be- ■ low, • and award the same by way of additional damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contee v. Findley, 1 H. & J. 331 (Md. 1802).

1 H. & J. 331 (Contee v. Findley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. Dobler & Mudge
55 A. 704 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1903)
Hammond v. Hammond
2 Md. Ch. 306 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1828)