Conte Vs. Conte
This text of 484 P.3d 951 (Conte Vs. Conte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WAYNE D. CONTE, No. 82672 Appellant, vs. JESUSA E. CONTE, Respondent, FL APR 2 3 2021 BROM/ CLE BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a pretrial order granting a motion to strike appellant's exhibits. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Mary D. Perry, Judge. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a pretrial order striking exhibits. Accordingly this court lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
, J. Cadish
Piekpdi ? Pickering Herndon
'Appellant's motion for stay is denied as moot.
-2_1- ti 303 cc: Hon. Mary D. Perry, District Judge, Family Court Division Wayne D. Conte Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 P.3d 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conte-vs-conte-nev-2021.