Conte Vs. Conte

484 P.3d 951
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2021·No. 82672·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WAYNE D. CONTE, No. 82672 Appellant,

vs.

JESUSA E. CONTE, Respondent,

FL APR 2 3 2021

BROM/

CLE BY

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a pretrial order granting a motion to strike appellant's exhibits. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Mary D. Perry, Judge.

This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a pretrial order striking exhibits. Accordingly this court lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

, J.

Cadish

Piekpdi ?

Pickering Herndon

'Appellant's motion for stay is denied as moot.

-2_1- ti 303

cc: Hon. Mary D. Perry, District Judge, Family Court Division Wayne D. Conte Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conte Vs. Conte, 484 P.3d 951 (Neb. 2021).

484 P.3d 951 (Conte Vs. Conte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)