Conte v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 57 F. App'x 172 (Conte v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fatoumata O. Conte seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of her second motion to reopen immigration proceedings, which she labeled as a “Motion to Accept the Affirmative Application for Relief Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, which was designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny Conte’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F. App'x 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conte-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2003.