Conte v. Conte

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 2019·No. 78675·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WAYNE D. CONTE, No. 78675 vs. Appellant,

FILED

JESUSA E. CONTE,

Respondent. MAY 2 2 2019 ELI A. BROWN OLE REF& COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY WOW CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from an order of dismissal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust u. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed). This court therefore lacks jurisdiction, and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Aeksbat_.0 1/411./4-12 J Stiglich Silver

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA lot 7,73q

(OJ I94Th cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge Wayne D. Conte Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

01 194Th dzfrip= 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conte v. Conte, (Neb. 2019).

Conte v. Conte (Conte v. Conte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)