Conte v. Conte
This text of Conte v. Conte (Conte v. Conte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WAYNE D. CONTE, No. 78675 vs. Appellant, FILED JESUSA E. CONTE, Respondent. MAY 2 2 2019 ELI A. BROWN OLE REF& COURT ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY WOW CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from an order of dismissal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust u. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed). This court therefore lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Aeksbat_.0 1/411./4-12 J Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA lot 7,73q (OJ I94Th cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge Wayne D. Conte Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
01 194Th dzfrip= 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Conte v. Conte, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conte-v-conte-nev-2019.