Contas v. Bradford
55 A. 989, 206 Pa. 291, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 701
Opinion
Wé can add nothing to what has been so well and concisely said in demonstration of the correctness of his judgment by the learned judge of the court below. All the assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Contas v. Bradford, 55 A. 989, 206 Pa. 291, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 701 (Pa. 1903).
55 A. 989 (Contas v. Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Borough of Ebensburg v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Board
893 A.2d 181 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
P.R. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
759 A.2d 434 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Maine Turnpike Authority v. Brennan
342 A.2d 719 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1975)
Commonwealth v. McHugh
178 A.2d 556 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Noel v. Summit
148 S.W. 194 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Mandeville v. Courtwright
126 F. 1007 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1903)