Contas Lion Coal Co. v. Contas

289 P. 368, 42 Wyo. 59, 1930 Wyo. LEXIS 33
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1930
Docket1635
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 289 P. 368 (Contas Lion Coal Co. v. Contas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Contas Lion Coal Co. v. Contas, 289 P. 368, 42 Wyo. 59, 1930 Wyo. LEXIS 33 (Wyo. 1930).

Opinion

RineR, Justice.

This ease is an appeal attempted to be taken from an order of award made by the District Court of Sweetwater .County in a proceeding had under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state. An examination of the record discloses that the order we are asked to review was made and dated November 30, 1929. The record on appeal was not filed in this court until February 13, 1930. There does not appear to be in the record any order extending the time for filing the record on appeal here.

The authority given us to review orders and decisions of this kind is found in Section 4328, W. C. S. 1920, as *60 amended by Section 2, Chapter 124, Laws of 1925, which in mandatory terms provides, '‘that the petition in error, bill of exceptions and record on appeal must be filed in the Supreme Court within thirty (30) days from the date of decision or order on motion for a new trial by a court or judge, unless the time be extended by order of court or judge.”

It has been several times decided by this court that:

“Unless an appeal in such cases be perfected by filing the record in this court within the time as limited by the statute, or as extended by order of the court or judge, this court has no jurisdiction of the ease on appeal.” Owl Creek Coal Co. v. Krivokapich, (Wyo.) 281 Pac. 195, 196; Reintsma v. Standard Oil Co., 37 Wyo. 471, 263 P. 619.

Inasmuch as the law governing the prosecution of this appeal has not been obeyed, we are without jurisdiction to consider the case, and it must be dismissed.

Dismissed.,

Blume, C. J., and Kimball, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zabaleta v. FMC Corp.
638 P.2d 648 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1981)
Marsh, Guardian v. Aljoe
3 P.2d 103 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 P. 368, 42 Wyo. 59, 1930 Wyo. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contas-lion-coal-co-v-contas-wyo-1930.