Contant v. Bank Of America Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 8, 2021
Docket1:17-cv-03139
StatusUnknown

This text of Contant v. Bank Of America Corporation (Contant v. Bank Of America Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Contant v. Bank Of America Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

FLOGUET INEWMAN 60 East 42nd Street, 48th Floor Fax 212.689.5101 AL & KENNEY up New York, New York 10165 www.horklaw.com

deavaleri@hnrklaw.com October 7, 2021 Claimant AMA Capital Management LLC shall file a supplemental lett by October 15, 2021, providing the basis for sealing its information i its filing and in Plaintiffs’ filing in accordance with the three-part test VIA ECF in Lugosch. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). So Ordered. Honorable Lorna G. Schofield United States District Court Judge Dated: October 8, 2021 . Southern District of New York New York, New York Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse LORNA G. SCHOFIEL 40 Foley Square UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE New York, NY 10007 Re: Contant, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 17-cv-3139 Dear Judge Schofield, This firm was recently retained as local counsel to claimant AMA Capital Management, LLC (“AMA”) in the above-captioned matter. In accordance with the Court’s September 16, 2021 Order (ECF 488), AMA is today filing its response (the “Letter Motion”) to Class Counsel’s request for review of AMA’s claim submitted to the Court on September 23, 2021 (ECF 490). Pursuant to Your Honor’s Rule I.D.3, we write to request that the Court permit AMA to (a) file redacted versions of its Letter Motion and (b) file certain exhibits in connection with that Letter Motion under seal, specifically Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 9. We make this request for the same reasons stated in Class Counsel’s September 23, 2021 letter requesting to seal their letter brief and exhibits under seal (ECF 489), namely, that parts of the Letter Motion contain trade secrets, banking information, and competitively sensitive information about AMA’s business. Further to Your Honor’s Rule I.D.3, AMA’s counsel will file the unredacted version of the letter brief with proposed highlights and full set of corresponding exhibits under seal. Thereafter, Counsel will file a redacted version of the Letter Motion and a set of corresponding exhibits that includes placeholders for those proposed to be filed under seal on the record. We will also serve the unredacted Letter Motion and full set of unsealed corresponding exhibits upon Class Counsel. Although we will use ECF to identify the parties and attorneys of record who should have access to the sealed documents, we have also included an appendix identifying those parties and attorneys here.

WW. OVLIVLIVI i AVJUU ce i LN CVV IVLAAIN October 7, 2021 Page 2 REGAL & KENNEY

Given the resurgence of COVID-19, we are not mailing courtesy copies to chambers of the documents we propose to file under seal. Please let us know if Your Honor would like us to email a courtesy copy to chambers and we will do so. We thank Your Honor for the Court’s time and attention to this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Damian R. Cavaleri

cc: All Counsel of Record (by ECF)

October 7.’ NJ. WDRLIVLICIU i AVJUU ce i LN CVV IVLAAIN October 7, 2021 □ Page 3 REGAL & KENNEYur

APPENDIX

Michael Dell’ Angelo Michael J. Kane BERGER MONTAGUE PC 1818 Market St, Suite 3600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Tel: (215) 875-3000 mdellangelo@bm.net mkane@bm.net Counsel for the Class Scott O. Luskin PAYNE & FEARS LLP 200 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 825 El Segundo, CA 90245 Tel.: (310) 689-1764 SOL@paynefears.com Counsel for AMA Capital Damian R. Cavaleri HOGUET NEWMAN REGAL & KENNEY, LLP One Grand Central Place 60 East 42nd Street, 48th Floor New York, NY 10165 Tel.: 212.689.8808 deavaleri@hnrklaw.com Counsel for AMA Capital

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Contant v. Bank Of America Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contant-v-bank-of-america-corporation-nysd-2021.