Consumers Salt Co. v. Riggins

California Supreme Court

Consumers Salt Co. v. Riggins

290 P. 569, 210 Cal. 47, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 347

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 21, 1930

DocketDocket No. L.A. 11592.

StatusPublished

This text of 290 P. 569 (Consumers Salt Co. v. Riggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Consumers Salt Co. v. Riggins, 290 P. 569, 210 Cal. 47, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 347 (Cal. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

On December 4, 1929, this court filed its opinion and judgment in the above-entitled cause ordering a peremptory writ of mandate to issue directing the respondent Riggins to turn over and deliver to his successor in the office of secretary of the Consumers Salt Company the office and paraphernalia, together with the corporate books, papers, files and seal of the company. (208 Cal. 537 *48 [282 Pac. 954].) After due demand made therefor, the respondent disregarded and failed to comply with the terms of the decision and judgment. The petitioners thereupon obtained an order directing the respondent and one Y. E. Stockwell to show cause before this court why they should not be adjudged in contempt, and a citation was duly issued. Many affidavits and counter-affidavits were filed, and considerable difficulty was experienced in securing service on the respondent Eiggins, service finally being made upon his attorney by order of the court.

When the matter was finally heard in open court, the respondents Eiggins and Stockwell being personally present, an order was made directing them to bring into court and deliver to the custody of the clerk of the court the records, books, files and corporate seal of the company, to await the determination of the contempt proceeding. That order was complied with. No further proceedings having been had, and no cause having been shown why the books, files, papers and seal of the Consumers Salt Company now in the possession of the clerk of this court should not rightfully be turned over and delivered to the petitioner C. L. Mullholand, whom this court has determined in the above decision to be entitled thereto as the secretary of the Consumers Salt Company, it is ordered that the clerk of this court forthwith turn over and deliver said records, books, papers, files and corporate seal, and any other property belonging to the corporation and in his custody, to the said Mullholand, and that thereupon the order to show cause and citation heretofore issued in this matter be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

On December 4, 1929, this court filed its opinion and judgment in the above-entitled cause ordering a peremptory writ of mandate to issue directing the respondent Riggins to turn over and deliver to his successor in the office of secretary of the Consumers Salt Company the office and paraphernalia, together with the corporate books, papers, files and seal of the company. (208 Cal. 537 *48 [282 Pac. 954].) After due demand made therefor, the respondent disregarded and failed to comply with the terms of the decision and judgment. The petitioners thereupon obtained an order directing the respondent and one Y. E. Stockwell to show cause before this court why they should not be adjudged in contempt, and a citation was duly issued. Many affidavits and counter-affidavits were filed, and considerable difficulty was experienced in securing service on the respondent Eiggins, service finally being made upon his attorney by order of the court.

When the matter was finally heard in open court, the respondents Eiggins and Stockwell being personally present, an order was made directing them to bring into court and deliver to the custody of the clerk of the court the records, books, files and corporate seal of the company, to await the determination of the contempt proceeding. That order was complied with. No further proceedings having been had, and no cause having been shown why the books, files, papers and seal of the Consumers Salt Company now in the possession of the clerk of this court should not rightfully be turned over and delivered to the petitioner C. L. Mullholand, whom this court has determined in the above decision to be entitled thereto as the secretary of the Consumers Salt Company, it is ordered that the clerk of this court forthwith turn over and deliver said records, books, papers, files and corporate seal, and any other property belonging to the corporation and in his custody, to the said Mullholand, and that thereupon the order to show cause and citation heretofore issued in this matter be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 P. 569, 210 Cal. 47, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consumers-salt-co-v-riggins-cal-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack