Consumers Energy Company v. Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company
This text of Consumers Energy Company v. Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company (Consumers Energy Company v. Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 21, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
157926 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, Elizabeth T. Clement, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 157926 COA: 341216 Lenawee CC: 16-005626-CC ADRIAN & BLISSFIELD RAIL ROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and CITY OF ADRIAN, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 21, 2018 t1217 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Consumers Energy Company v. Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consumers-energy-company-v-adrian-blissfield-rail-road-company-mich-2018.