Consumers Energy Company v. Acey

Michigan Supreme Court

Consumers Energy Company v. Acey

764 N.W.2d 280, 483 Mich. 985

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 1, 2009·No. 137425·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Summary Disposition May 1, 2009:

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the Court of Appeals judgment to the extent that it reversed the trial court’s order limiting the easement to a “66-foot working strip.” Although the majority of the written easements at issue in this case does not include the limitation, the plaintiff voluntarily and expressly agreed on the record to the imposition of this limitation. See Dana Corp v Employment Security Comm, 371 Mich 107, 110 (1963); Bowman v Coleman, 356 Mich 390, 392-393 (1959). Court of Appeals No. 277039.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summary Disposition May 1, 2009:

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the Court of Appeals judgment to the extent that it reversed the trial court’s order limiting the easement to a “66-foot working strip.” Although the majority of the written easements at issue in this case does not include the limitation, the plaintiff voluntarily and expressly agreed on the record to the imposition of this limitation. See Dana Corp v Employment Security Comm, 371 Mich 107, 110 (1963); Bowman v Coleman, 356 Mich 390, 392-393 (1959). Court of Appeals No. 277039.

Consumers Energy Company v. Acey, 764 N.W.2d 280, 483 Mich. 985 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

764 N.W.2d 280 (Consumers Energy Company v. Acey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related