Consumers Energy Company v. Acey
This text of 764 N.W.2d 280 (Consumers Energy Company v. Acey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Summary Disposition May 1, 2009:
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the Court of Appeals judgment to the extent that it reversed the trial court’s order limiting the easement to a “66-foot working strip.” Although the majority of the written easements at issue in this case does not include the limitation, the plaintiff voluntarily and expressly agreed on the record to the imposition of this limitation. See Dana Corp v Employment Security Comm, 371 Mich 107, 110 (1963); Bowman v Coleman, 356 Mich 390, 392-393 (1959). Court of Appeals No. 277039.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 N.W.2d 280, 483 Mich. 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consumers-energy-company-v-acey-mich-2009.