Consumer Lightning Products, Inc. v. Allen Enterprises, Inc.
This text of 911 So. 2d 884 (Consumer Lightning Products, Inc. v. Allen Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONSUMER LIGHTNING PRODUCTS, INC.; Mag Holdings, Inc., a North Carolina corporation; Mag Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation; and Cabletrax, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Appellants,
v.
ALLEN ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Keith D. Miller of Boswell & Dunlap, LLP, Bartow, for Appellants.
J. Timothy Schulte, Lori W. Smith, and Chad Brandt of Zimmerman, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgment on the merits, but we dismiss that part of the appeal relating to attorney's fees as premature.
STRINGER, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
911 So. 2d 884, 2005 WL 2372756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/consumer-lightning-products-inc-v-allen-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-2005.