Consum Fincl Protc Bur v. All Amer Check Cashing

953 F.3d 381
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2020·No. 18-60302·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 18-60302 March 20, 2020 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU,

Plaintiff - Appellee v.

ALL AMERICAN CHECK CASHING, INCORPORATED; MID-STATE FINANCE, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL E. GRAY, Individually,

Defendants - Appellants __________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi __________________________

(Opinion March 3, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 2020 WL 1026927)

Before OWEN, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, STEWART, DENNIS, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. 1

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not

disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this

case en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc

with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R.

41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated March 3, 2020, is vacated.

1 Judge Ho is recused and did not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consum Fincl Protc Bur v. All Amer Check Cashing, 953 F.3d 381 (5th Cir. 2020).

953 F.3d 381 (Consum Fincl Protc Bur v. All Amer Check Cashing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related